The Inkjet Business Model – A New Twist

I haven’t done the research myself to verify this, but according to something I read not long ago, printer ink is the most expensive commodity on the planet by weight.

Seems reasonable to me. How else can they sell you a printer for so little and make any money? They want you using the ink, obviously. One printer I owned didn’t let me print in black and white (the majority of my use) if the color cartridge ran out. Once you buy the darn thing, they gotcha. Buy more ink cartridges at an outrageous price or stare at a boat anchor sitting by your desk.

Manufacturers of other consumer products have caught on to the inkjet business model in which consumables provide the vast majority of the profit. Get enough people buying into that, and they support some other dude’s private jet.

The latest example of this trickery in my life is a Keurig single-cup coffee brewer. A family member uses one, which apparently has worked fine for a long while, and I decided to try a Keurig B70 as a Christmas present to myself. Sometime on the afternoon of December 25, 2010, I brewed my first cup from the sample pack and thought, Is this cool, or what?

I like strong coffee. As the rancher-father of a friend reportedly described it, “I’ll be darned if I’m gonna drink a gallon of water to get a single cup of coffee.” Amen, sir.

The array of coffees available in the single-serving K-cups dazzled me. As you might imagine, I focused on extra bold dark roast varieties and thought I’d arrived in coffee heaven: in about a minute, one hot, fresh mug of java that will darn near support a spoon vertical in the cup. Real coffee, worthy of the name.

Okay, so there’s got to be a downside, right? There are two: the brewer isn’t cheap, and neither is the coffee, but you can find both at discount stores and avoid paying full retail. Each cup still costs more than if you brewed a pot in a standard coffee maker, but on the other hand you don’t end up throwing out a half pot of stale coffee, either.

I tried the sample pack that came with the brewer, settled on a few favorite varieties, and ordered some boxes online. It was great . . . until the problems started, problems that apparently have been around with these brewers since 2006 or thereabouts, and which I would have known about if I had only taken the time to do a bit of research.

The Keurig is notorious, at least on a number of coffee lover forums, for displaying a NOT READY light that won’t go away unless you press the menu and brew buttons in just the right order while rubbing your stomach and head simultaneously and standing on one leg. It’s also developed a reputation for failure to brew and brewing “short cups” of less than the selected amount of water for the size of cup you want.

Since I didn’t know any of this before I bought it, the big surprise came when my brewer began acting up. I Googled “Keurig coffee maker problems” and found a full page of links. Some comments mentioned having gone through as many as five replacement brewers, readily supplied by polite customer service voices. The only catch is the requirement to return the removable K-cup holder assembly from the old unit as “proof of purchase,” although they don’t offer a prepaid postage option for doing that. A minor irritant in the total scheme of things, but in principle it’s still aggravating.

I read about fifty comments, few of which mentioned having found a permanent solution, and finally decided to contact Keurig customer service for myself. I can confirm being treated politely, and also being handled from a prepared script. When I finally made it to a technician to help solve the issues of failure to brew and brewing short cups, I patiently answered the questions and followed the instructions mentioned time and time again on the forums. After thirty minutes, the voice offered to send a new brewer to my house at no charge, except for the caution that if I don’t return the old K-cup holder assembly, I will be charged for the replacement brewer. Like I’m going through all this hassle to defraud them of a brewer that works as advertised.

From everything I can gather, Keurig has had this problem with the brewers for years, and it has nothing to do with customers using unfiltered water, or failing to periodically clean out the three nozzles in the needle that punctures the top of the K-cups, or not seating the water reservoir securely on the base, or failure to run a brew cycle of plain water after making a cup of hot cocoa.

It’s a design flaw, pure and simple, and rather than deal with that by acknowledging the problem, Keurig insists on putting customers through a series of procedures that has never solved anything, then sending out replacement brewers that will prove to be no less flawed than the originals.

One comment on the forums indicated a possible solution. A customer studied how the brewer works, and during a failed brew cycle noticed water dribbling out of a 90-degree angled rubber spigot with two holes at upper rear of the water reservoir. He concluded that there was no reason for water to return to the reservoir, asked the simple question of why it was doing that, and focused on the way in which water is delivered from the reservoir to the heated holding tank in the brewer.

So he experimented with it, and ultimately decided that the pump might be too weak to overcome a slight vacuum in the reservoir, or maybe an air bubble gets in the lines. His solution was to use a BB to plug the left hole in the spigot and bingo, his problem with failure to brew and short cups disappeared. I tried that yesterday, and so far, so good.

At this point, I am flabbergasted that Keurig has been unable to solve a persistent problem with their brewers and can remain in business by sending out replacements. And yes, I understand that customers who aren’t having problems don’t visit forums and there may be many more of them out there than those who are. But the corollary is also logical, that dissatisfied customers simply throw the offending brewers in the trash and go back to their old, reliable Mr. Coffee.

And the bottom line for Keurig has to be that the markup on the sale of original brewers and profit on the K-cups more than offsets the cost of providing free replacements.

It’s the inkjet business model in new clothing, and the customer is once again being fooled by the livery.

Posted in Rants and Raves | Leave a comment

Koga’s Zero – by Jim Rearden

My original intent for the Visitor Stories logbook, to serve as a destination for personal flying experiences of aviators and “normal” folks as well, has never come to fruition by receiving much interest. Three notable exceptions came from fellow writers who graciously responded to my pleas for content and contributed interesting anecdotes: one humorous, one frightening experience told with a bit of after-the-fact humor, and one poignant story of a young-boy-turned-man’s fascination with airplanes and being touched by the tragic death of a close friend’s sister in the crash of an airliner.

Unwilling to abandon the idea of incorporating “guest bloggers,” I decided to alter the concept by including articles from other sources. In the seven months since launching this blog, I’ve published in the Visitor Stories logbook my personal tribute to a WWII fighter pilot, a seven-part account of the Doolittle raid on Tokyo during WWII by a participant, and the harrowing story of an airshow pilot who literally pulled the wings off an F-100 Super Sabre and survived by a matter of seconds and a few extra feet of altitude.

A good friend and fellow aviator recently sent me the following account of an incident that ultimately altered the course of the war in the Pacific and saved the lives of countless American fighter pilots. Initially tempted to publish this in the Single Ship logbook, I changed my mind because this is someone else’s account of an historical event. And although the author didn’t visit this site except through the actions of someone else, and he doesn’t have a clue about who I am and couldn’t care less, I’m guessing that he’d have no quarrel with my sharing this story. For anyone, aviator or not, interested in the history of a time in the world when all things good were threatened with extinction by the rapidly expanding obscenity of the Axis Powers, this is a remarkable tale extremely well told.

Jim Rearden, a forty-seven-year resident of Alaska, is the author of fourteen books and more than five hundred magazine articles, mostly about Alaska. Among his books is Koga’s Zero: The Fighter That Changed World War II, which can be purchased from Pictorial Histories Publishing Company, 713 South Third Street West, Missoula, MT 59801.

Note: For an excellent source of additional information on the Mitsubishi A6M Zero-Sen fighter, see Larry Dwyer’s The Aviation History On-Line Museum.

Koga’s Zero

by Jim Rearden

In April 1942 thirty-six Zeros attacking a British naval base at Colombo, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), were met by about sixty Royal Air Force aircraft of mixed types, many of them obsolete. Twenty-seven of the RAF planes went down: fifteen Hawker Hurricanes (of Battle of Britain fame), eight Fairey Swordfish, and four Fairey Fulmars. The Japanese lost one Zero.

Five months after America’s entry into the war, the Zero was still a mystery to U.S. Navy pilots. On May 7, 1942, in the Battle of the Coral Sea, fighter pilots from our aircraft carriers Lexington and Yorktown fought the Zero and didn’t know what to call it. Some misidentified it as the German Messerschmitt 109.

A few weeks later, on June 3 and 4, warplanes flew from the Japanese carriers Ryujo and Junyo to attack the American military base at Dutch Harbor in Alaska’s Aleutian archipelago. Japan’s attack on Alaska was intended to draw remnants of the U.S. fleet north from Pearl Harbor, away from Midway Island, where the Japanese were setting a trap. (The scheme ultimately backfired when our Navy pilots sank four of Japan’s first-line aircraft carriers at Midway, giving the United States a major turning-point victory.)

In the raid of June 4, twenty bombers blasted oil storage tanks, a warehouse, a hospital, a hangar, and a beached freighter, while eleven Zeros strafed at will. Chief Petty Officer Makoto Endo led a three-plane Zero section from the Ryujo, whose other pilots were Flight Petty Officers Tsuguo Shikada and Tadayoshi Koga. Koga, a small nineteen-year old, was the son of a rural carpenter. His Zero, serial number 4593, was light gray, with the imperial rising-sun insignia on its wings and fuselage. It had left the Mitsubishi Nagoya aircraft factory on February 19, only three and a half months earlier, so it was the latest design.

Shortly before the bombs fell on Dutch Harbor that day, soldiers at an adjacent Army outpost had seen three Zeros shoot down a lumbering Catalina amphibian. As the plane began to sink, most of the seven-member crew climbed into a rubber raft and began paddling toward shore.  The soldiers watched in horror as the Zeros strafed the crew until all were killed. The Zeros are believed to have been those of Endo, Shikada, and Koga.

After massacring the Catalina crew, Endo led his section to Dutch Harbor, where it joined the other eight Zeros in strafing. It was then (according to Shikada, interviewed in 1984) that Koga’s Zero was hit by ground fire. An Army intelligence team later reported, “Bullet holes entered the plane from both upper and lower sides.” One of the bullets severed the return oil line between the oil cooler and the engine. As the engine continued to run, it pumped oil from the broken line. A Navy photo taken during the raid shows a Zero trailing what appears to be smoke. It is probably oil, and there is little doubt that this is Zero 4593.

After the raid, as the enemy planes flew back toward their carriers, eight American Curtiss Warhawk P-40s shot down four VaI (Aichi D3A) dive bombers thirty miles west of Dutch Harbor. In the swirling, minutes-long dogfight, Lt. John J. Cape shot down a plane identified as a Zero. Another Zero was almost instantly on his tail. He climbed and rolled, trying to evade, but those were the wrong maneuvers to escape a Zero. The enemy fighter easily stayed with him, firing its two deadly 20-mm cannon and two 7.7-mm machine guns. Cape and his plane plunged into the sea. Another Zero shot up the P-40 of Lt. Winfield McIntyre, who survived a crash landing with a dead engine.

Endo and Shikada accompanied Koga as he flew his oil-spewing airplane to Akutan Island, twenty-five miles away, which had been designated for emergency landings. A Japanese submarine stood nearby to pick up downed pilots. The three Zeros circled low over the green, treeless island. At a level, grassy valley floor half a mile inland, Koga lowered his wheels and flaps and eased toward a three-point landing. As his main wheels touched, they dug in, and the Zero flipped onto its back, tossing water, grass, and gobs of mud. The valley floor was a bog, and the knee-high grass concealed water.

Endo and Shikada circled. There was no sign of life. If Koga was dead, their duty was to destroy the downed fighter. Incendiary bullets from their machine guns would have done the job. But Koga was a friend, and they couldn’t bring themselves to shoot. Perhaps he would recover, destroy the plane himself, and walk to the waiting submarine. Endo and Shikada abandoned the downed fighter and returned to the Ryujo, two hundred miles to the south. (The Ryujo was sunk two months later in the eastern Solomons by planes from the aircraft carrier Saratoga. Endo was killed in action at Rabaul on October 12, 1943, while Shikada survived the war and eventually became a banker.)

The wrecked Zero lay in the bog for more than a month, unseen by U.S. patrol planes and offshore ships. Akutan is often foggy, and constant Aleutian winds create unpleasant turbulence over the rugged island. Most pilots preferred to remain over water, so planes rarely flew over Akutan. However, on July 10 a U.S. Navy Catalina (PBY) amphibian returning from overnight patrol crossed the island. A gunner named Wall called, “Hey, there’s an airplane on the ground down there. It has meatballs on the wings.” That meant the rising-sun insignia. The patrol plane’s commander, Lt. William Thies, descended for a closer look. What he saw excited him.

Back at Dutch Harbor, Thies persuaded his squadron commander to let him take a party to the downed plane. No one then knew that it was a Zero. Ens. Robert Larson was Thies’s copilot when the plane was discovered. He remembers reaching the Zero. “We approached cautiously, walking in about a foot of water covered with grass.” Koga’s body, thoroughly strapped in, was upside down in the plane, his head barely submerged in the water. “We were surprised at the details of the airplane,” Larson continues. “It was well built, with simple, unique features. Inspection plates could be opened by pushing on a black dot with a finger. A latch would open, and one could pull the plate out. Wingtips folded by unlatching them and pushing them up by hand. The pilot had a parachute and a life raft.” Koga’s body was buried nearby. In 1947 it was shifted to a cemetery on nearby Adak Island, and later, it is believed, his remains were returned to Japan.

Thies had determined that the wrecked plane was a nearly new Zero, which suddenly gave it special meaning, for it was repairable. However, unlike U.S. warplanes, which had detachable wings, the Zero’s wings were integral with the fuselage. This complicated salvage and shipping. Navy crews fought the plane out of the bog. The tripod that was used to lift the engine, and later the fuselage, sank three to four feet into the mud. The Zero was too heavy to turn over with the equipment on hand, so it was left upside down while a tractor dragged it on a skid to the beach and a barge.

At Dutch Harbor it was turned over with a crane, cleaned, and crated, wings and all. When the awkward crate containing Zero 4593 arrived at North Island Naval Air Station, San Diego, a twelve-foot-high stockade was erected around it inside a hangar. Marines guarded the priceless plane while Navy crews worked around the clock to make it airworthy. (There is no evidence the Japanese ever knew we had salvaged Koga’s plane.)

In mid-September Lt. Cmdr. Eddie R. Sanders studied it for a week as repairs were completed. Forty-six years later he clearly remembered his flights in Koga’s Zero. “My log shows that I made twenty-four flights in Zero 4593 from 20 September to 15 October 1942,” Sanders told me. “These flights covered performance tests such as we do on planes undergoing Navy tests.”

The very first flight exposed weaknesses of the Zero that our pilots could exploit with proper tactics. The Zero had superior maneuverability only at the lower speeds used in dogfighting, with short turning radius and excellent aileron control at very low speeds.  However, immediately apparent was the fact that the ailerons froze up at speeds above two hundred knots, so that rolling maneuvers at those speeds were slow and required much force on the control stick. It rolled to the left much easier than to the right. Also, its engine cut out under negative acceleration (as when nosing into a dive) due to its float-type carburetor.

“We now had an answer for our pilots who were unable to escape a pursuing Zero. We told them to go into a vertical power dive, using negative acceleration, if possible, to open the range quickly and gain advantageous speed while the Zero’s engine was stopped. At about two hundred knots, we instructed them to roll hard right before the Zero pilot could get his sights lined up. This recommended tactic was radioed to the fleet after my first flight of Koga’s plane, and soon the welcome answer came back: It works!” Sanders said, satisfaction sounding in his voice even after nearly half a century.

Thus by late September 1942 Allied pilots in the Pacific theater knew how to escape a pursuing Zero. “Was Zero 4593 a good representative of the Model 21 Zero?” I asked Sanders. In other words, was the repaired airplane 100 percent? “About 98 percent,” he replied. The zero was added to the U.S. Navy inventory and assigned its Mitsubishi serial number. The Japanese colors and insignia were replaced with those of the U.S. Navy and later the U.S. Army, which also test-flew it. The Navy pitted it against the best American fighters of the time—the P-38 Lockheed Lightning, the P-39 Bell Airacobra, the P-51 North American Mustang, the F4F-4 Grumman Wildcat, and the F4U ChanceVought Corsair—and for each type developed the most effective tactics and altitudes for engaging the Zero.

In February 1945 Cmdr. Richard G. Crommelin was taxiing Zero 4593 at San Diego Naval Air Station, where it was being used to train pilots bound for the Pacific war zone. An SB2C Curtiss Helldiver overran it and chopped it up from tail to cockpit. Crommelin survived, but the Zero didn’t. Only a few pieces of Zero 4593 remain today. The manifold pressure gauge, the air-speed indicator, and the folding panel of the port wingtip were donated to the Navy Museum at the Washington, D.C., Navy Yard by Rear Adm. William N. Leonard, who salvaged them at San Diego in 1945. In addition, two of its manufacturer’s plates are in the Alaska Aviation Heritage Museum in Anchorage, donated by Arthur Bauman, the photographer. Leonard recently told me, “The captured Zero was a treasure. To my knowledge no other captured machine has ever unlocked so many secrets at a time when the need was so great.”

A somewhat comparable event took place off North Africa in 1944—coincidentally on the same date, June 4, that Koga crashed his Zero. A squadron commanded by Capt. Daniel V. Gallery, aboard the escort carrier Guadalcanal, captured the German submarine U-505, boarding and securing the disabled vessel before the fleeing crew could scuttle it. Code books, charts, and operating instructions rescued from U-505 proved quite valuable to the Allies. Captain Gallery later wrote, “Reception committees which we were able to arrange as a result … may have had something to do with the sinking of nearly three hundred U-boats in the next eleven months.”  By the time of U-505’s capture, however, the German war effort was already starting to crumble (D-day came only two days later), while Japan still dominated the Pacific when Koga’s plane was recovered.

A classic example of the Koga plane’s value occurred on April 1, 1943, when Ken Walsh, a Marine flying an F4U Chance-Vought Corsair over the Russell Islands southeast of Bougainville, encountered a lone Zero. “I turned toward him, planning a deflection shot, but before I could get on him, he rolled, putting his plane right under my tail and within range. I had been told the Zero was extremely maneuverable, but if I hadn’t seen how swiftly his plane flipped onto my tail, I wouldn’t have believed it,” Walsh recently recalled. “I remembered briefings that resulted from test flights of Koga’s Zero on how to escape from a following Zero. With that lone Zero on my tail I did a split S, and with its nose down and full throttle my Corsair picked up speed fast. I wanted at least 240 knots, preferably 260. Then, as prescribed, I rolled hard right. As I did this and continued my dive, tracers from the Zero zinged past my plane’s belly.

“From information that came from Koga’s Zero, I knew the Zero rolled more slowly to the right than to the left. If I hadn’t known which way to turn or roll, I’d have probably rolled to my left. If I had done that, the Zero would likely have turned with me, locked on, and had me.  I used that maneuver a number of times to get away from Zeros.” By war’s end Capt. (later Lt. Col.) Kenneth Walsh had twenty-one aerial victories (seventeen Zeros, three Vais, one Pete), making him the war’s fourth-ranking Marine Corps ace. He was awarded the Medal of Honor for two extremely courageous air battles he fought over the Solomon Islands in his Corsair during August 1943. He retired from the Marine Corps in 1962 after more than twenty-eight years of service. Walsh holds the Distinguished Flying Cross with six Gold Stars, the Air Medal with fourteen Gold Stars, and more than a dozen other medals and honors.

How important was our acquisition of Koga’s Zero? Masatake Okumiya, who survived more air-sea battles than any other Japanese naval officer, was aboard the Ryujo when Koga made his last flight. He later co-authored two classic books, Zero and Midway. Okumiya has written that the Allies’ acquisition of Koga’s Zero was “no less serious” than the Japanese defeat at Midway and “did much to hasten our final defeat.” If that doesn’t convince you, ask Ken Walsh.

INSIDE THE ZERO

The Zero was Japan’s main fighter plane throughout World War II. By war’s end about 11,500 Zeros had been produced in five main variants. In March 1939, when the prototype Zero was rolled out, Japan was in some ways still so backward that the plane had to be hauled by oxcart from the Mitsubishi factory twenty-nine miles to the airfield where it flew. It represented a great leap in technology. At the start of World War II, some countries’ fighters were open cockpit, fabric-covered biplanes. A low-wing all-metal monoplane carrier fighter, predecessor to the Zero, had been adopted by the Japanese in the mid-1930s, while the U.S. Navy’s standard fighter was still a biplane. But the world took little notice of Japan’s advanced military aircraft, so the Zero came as a great shock to Americans at Pearl Harbor and afterward.

A combination of nimbleness and simplicity gave it fighting qualities that no Allied plane could match. Lightness, simplicity, ease of maintenance, sensitivity to controls, and extreme maneuverability were the main elements that the designer Jiro Horikoshi built into the Zero. The Model 21 flown by Koga weighed 5,500 pounds, including fuel, ammunition, and pilot, while U.S. fighters weighed 7,500 pounds and up. Early models had no protective armor or self-sealing fuel tanks, although these were standard features on U.S. fighters. Despite its large-diameter 940-hp radial engine, the Zero had one of the slimmest silhouettes of any World War II fighter. The maximum speed of Koga’s Zero was 326 mph at 16,000 feet, not especially fast for a 1942 fighter. But high speed wasn’t the reason for the Zero’s great combat record. Agility was. Its large ailerons gave it great maneuverability at low speeds. It could even outmaneuver the famed British Spitfire. Advanced U.S. fighters produced toward the war’s end still couldn’t turn with the Zero, but they were faster and could outclimb and outdive it. Without self-sealing fuel tanks, the Zero was easily flamed when hit in any of its three wing and fuselage tanks or its droppable belly tank. And without protective armor, its pilot was vulnerable.

In 1941 the Zero’s range of 1,675 nautical miles (1,930 statute miles) was one of the wonders of the aviation world. No other fighter plane had ever routinely flown such a distance. Saburo Sakai, Japan’s highest-scoring surviving World War II ace, with sixty-four kills, believes that if the Zero had not been developed, Japan “would not have decided to start the war.” Other Japanese authorities echo this opinion, and the confidence it reflects was not, in the beginning at least, misplaced.

Today the Zero is one of the rarest of all major fighter planes of World War II. Only sixteen complete and assembled examples are known to exist. Of these, only two are flyable: one owned by Planes of Fame, in Chino, California, and the other by the Confederate Air Force, in Midland, Texas.

Posted in Visitor Stories | 10 Comments

Common Sense Remedies

Most of us have probably received pass-along emails claiming to offer some miraculous, apparently heretofore undiscovered (or ignored by the medical profession) cure for just about anything that ails the human body. Another favorite is a list of tricks to avoid certain calamities awaiting us while performing everyday activities.

A few years ago, I got one about bananas. I looked for a copy in preparation for writing this post, but I must have decided that I didn’t like bananas enough to make them a part of every meal. I could, however, end every meal with Bananas Foster, although I’m pretty sure that’s not what the information recommended.

Then there was the one about the curative properties of cinnamon. I liked reading it, because along with vanilla, cinnamon is one of my all-time favorite flavors. I use it on Bananas Foster, as a matter of fact, so I could easily increase my consumption of that famous dessert and get a twofer.

Not too long ago I received a list of six suggestions for easing some of the trials of daily life that are simply too logical to ignore. After reading them, I thought, Why didn’t I think of these? Anyway, here they are:

1. For females: Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting a male to hold the vegetables while you chop.

2. For males: Avoid arguments with females about lifting the toilet seat by using the sink.

3. For high blood pressure sufferers: Simply cut yourself and bleed for a few minutes, thus reducing the pressure on your veins. Don’t forget to use a timer.

4. For mornings on a deadline: A mouse trap placed on top of your alarm clock will prevent you from rolling over and going back to sleep after hitting the snooze button.

5. For illness: If you have a bad cough, take a large dose of laxative. You’ll be afraid to cough.

6. For fixing things: You really only need four tools in life: WD-40, duct tape, cable ties, and a hammer. If it doesn’t move and it should, use the WD-40. If it shouldn’t move and does, use the duct tape. If the duct tape doesn’t hold well enough, add the cable ties. If movement or lack of it isn’t the issue, and you can’t fix it with a hammer, you’ve got an electrical problem. Never try to fix it yourself. As a matter of fact, I don’t personally recommend calling an electrician. They charge too much, and if the truth be known, they don’t understand what happens inside a wire any more than you do. My suggestion is to use the hammer on the problem to relieve your frustration, toss it in the trash, and buy another.

I’ve found these suggestions helpful for making life less complicated, and I hope they work for you as well.

Posted in Single Ship | Leave a comment

Not Just Another Day at Work

Twilight: [figurative] a period or state of gradual decline.

As a career military officer and history buff, I really enjoy reading books that take a close and detailed look at significant events in the history of war. The Twilight Warriors by Robert Gandt focuses on the closing months of WWII as described on the jacket: For 95 days in 1945, half a million Americans and Japanese clashed in the largest land-air-sea engagement in history. Okinawa was the last — and bloodiest — battle of the Pacific war. This is the story of the men who fought it.

No one on either side of the conflict doubts the eventual outcome. For a tightly knit band of naval aviators just out of training, and who call themselves Tail End Charlies, the greatest worry is that the war will end before they have a chance to face the enemy. Opposing them are the “young gods,” honor-bound Japanese airmen dedicated to the tradition of the classic samurai warrior, and who volunteer for one-way missions known as kamikaze.

Despite the flood of propaganda directed by the Japanese military at their own countrymen promising a final glorious victory, and at American service members warning of defeat and death on the island of Okinawa, the only realistic Japanese objective was to avoid the disgrace of unconditional surrender with a negotiated cessation of hostilities. And the tactic for achieving this outcome was very simple: kill enough Americans to convince the United States that the death toll suffered during the invasion of Japan would be far too high a price.

It very nearly worked: 12,250 Americans killed or missing, another 36,631 wounded. Among them were 4,907 Navy men with almost as many wounded. Thirty-four Allied ships were sunk and 368 damaged, with 763 aircraft lost, making Okinawa the costliest naval engagement in U.S. history.

Gandt provides a vivid account of the underlying reasons behind this horrific carnage from both sides of the conflict. Inter-service distrust and rivalries among the U.S. military leaders lengthened the ground battle, augmented by the decision of the senior Japanese commander to put aside the Samurai tradition of glorious death in a banzai charge and conduct a brilliant campaign of carefully planned mini-retreats. The longer the land battle raged, the longer the U.S. fleet surrounding Okinawa remained within easy striking distance of airfields in the Japanese home islands. Like killer bees, the kamikazes swarmed.

Based on the battle for Okinawa, estimates put the projected American death toll during the invasion of Japan at more than a million. In the years since, debate has continued over whether the decision to use the atomic bomb was in fact necessary to end the war in the Pacific. My purpose here is not to address that issue, only to share in this Visitor Stories logbook another example of an aviator’s “office” through the “magic” of 360-degree panoramic photography.

Col. Paul W. Tibbets sat in the cockpit of this B-29 Superfortress named after his mother, Enola Gay Tibbets, and on August 6, 1945, dropped the first atomic bomb code-named “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The link below puts you there and allows you to take a tour by “moving the lens” 360 degrees with your pointer, up and down, and to zoom in and out. As you do, think about one man at work in this office, the boss of a crew of ten other airmen, on a mission that changed the world forever.

Enola Gay Cockpit

Posted in Visitor Stories | 1 Comment

I Can’t See You

Camouflage is an essential component of survival in combat, and the objective is to eliminate visual contrast. Foot soldiers wear different camouflage clothing for jungle, desert, and arctic conditions. Snipers employ the ghillie suit to blend into the surrounding environment. Aircraft are painted in mottled patterns on the upper surface to conceal their shape from the prying eyes of an airborne enemy above, and white, pale blue, or gray to make it more difficult for a ground-based enemy to acquire and maintain visual contact. Unfortunately, early warning and weapons system radars don’t care about any of that.

During WWII, one of the most significant flaws of the German high command during the Battle of Britain was failure to appreciate the role of British radar in the RAF’s ability to manage a vastly outnumbered fighter force effectively enough to survive a bloody struggle of attrition. And in a classic case of a day late and a dollar short, it turns out that the Luftwaffe had within its grasp a weapon that might have altered the course of history.

A friend sent me these pictures and text, and I have to admit that at first glance, I thought it might be another case of someone using Photoshop trickery to alter the appearance of an airplane as I described in a previous post on this site titled “The Most Amazing Airplane in History.” To the contrary, the Horten Ho 2-29 represents another example of the technological gap between the inventiveness of German engineering in the 1940s and that of the Allies.

It has long been recognized that Germany’s technological expertise during the war was years ahead of the competition. The list is ominously impressive: the Panzer tank, V-1 and V-2 rockets, ME-262 jet fighter, extensive research into nuclear fission, and in the case of the Ho 2-29, a stealth bomber nearly 40 years prior to the Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk. With its smooth and elegant lines, this “flying wing” design could be a prototype for some future successor to the current-day stealth bomber. Fortunately for the Allies, the Germans were not able to build the aircraft on an industrial scale before the invasion of Europe.


Depending on the accuracy of the source, history can only show us what actually happened. But that’s never prevented historians from taking a hypothetical next step. In the case of WWII, it is clear that Hitler was at the same time a master of manipulation and an abject failure as supreme commander of German armed forces. His disregard of the advice of senior military commanders and critical unilateral decisions at multiple times throughout the war can be directly traced to the ultimate fall of the Third Reich. We can only guess at how different the outcome of the war might have been if he had listened to his generals, but one thing is certain: German ingenuity was way ahead of its time.

By 1943, Nazi high command feared the war was beginning to turn against them, and they were desperate to develop new weapons. Nazi bombers were suffering badly when faced with the speed and maneuverability of the Spitfire and other Allied fighters. Luftwaffe chief Hermann Goering demanded that designers come up with a bomber that would meet his requirements, one that could carry 2200 lbs over 600 miles flying at 600 mph.

Two pilot brothers in their thirties, Reimar and Walter Horten, were inspired to design the Ho 2-29 by the deaths of thousands of Luftwaffe pilots in the Battle of Britain. They suggested a flying wing design they had been working on for years. In theory, the flying wing was very efficient because it minimized drag, and the brothers were convinced that such a plane would meet Goering’s requirements with very high speeds in a dive and an incredibly long range.


Construction on a prototype was begun in Goettingen in Germany in 1944. Hitler’s engineers only made three, and conducted tests by dragging them behind a glider. The centre pod was made from a welded steel tube, and was designed to be powered by a BMW 003 engine. The 142-foot wingspan bomber was submitted for approval in 1944, and it would have exceeded Goering’s requirements by a huge margin: Berlin to NYC and back without refueling, thanks to the blended wing design and six BMW 003A or eight Junker Jumbo 004B turbojets. Hitler was desperate for a way to strike the United States, and the Ho 2-29 would have really tickled his Teutonic fancy.


But the most important innovation was Reimar Horten’s idea to coat the aircraft in a mix of charcoal dust and wood glue. He thought that the electromagnetic waves of radar would be absorbed by the high graphite content of the paint, and in conjunction with the aircraft’s sculpted surfaces, the craft would be rendered almost invisible to radar detectors. This was, as a matter of fact, the same method
eventually used by the U.S. in the early 1980s with the F-117A Nighthawk.


After the war, the Americans captured the prototype Ho 2-29s along with the blueprints and used some of the German technological advances to aid their own designs. But experts always doubted claims that the Horten could actually function as a stealth aircraft. Using the blueprints and the only remaining prototype craft, Northrop-Grumman (the defense firm behind the B-2) has built a full-size replica of a Horten Ho 2-29 with materials available in the 40s.

It took Northrop 2,500 man-hours and $250,000 to construct a non-flying replica that was radar-tested by placing it on a 50-foot articulating pole and exposing it to electromagnetic waves. The tests proved that the aircraft is not completely invisible to the type of radar used in the war. But thanks to the use of wood and carbon, jet engines integrated into the fuselage with intakes years ahead of their time, and its blended surfaces, the Ho 2-29 could have been over London eight minutes after the British early warning radar system detected it and well before RAF fighters could be scrambled to intercept.


Experts are now convinced that given a bit more time, mass deployment of this aircraft could have changed the course of the war. Luckily for Britain and possibly the world, the Horten flying wing fighter-bomber never got much further than the blueprint and prototype stage.

The research was filmed for a forthcoming documentary on the National Geographic Channel.

Posted in Single Ship | 2 Comments

Embarrassing Medical Exams

We all receive forwarded items from friends via email. Sometimes they involve serious subjects that the sender thinks we need to know about, or to further a personal cause, and on occasion, they are offered just for the pure fun of it. Although what we think is funny can vary as much as any other individual difference, I think comedy tends to be more universal, and I post the following in that spirit.

The original of this email included the names of actual health care professionals who supposedly submitted examples of embarrassing medical exams. Few patients schedule appointments with doctors for the fun of it, and to learn that physicians can end up on the receiving end of awkwardness makes reading these testimonials worth the time. Here goes:

1. A man rushes into the ER and yells, “My wife’s going to have her baby in a cab!” I grab my stuff, rush out to the cab, lift the lady’s dress and begin to take off her underwear.  Suddenly I notice that there are several cabs . . . and I’m in the wrong one.

2. At the beginning of my shift, I place a stethoscope on an elderly and slightly deaf female patient’s anterior chest wall. “Big breaths,” I instruct. “Yes, they used to be,” replies the patient.

3. One day I have to be the bearer of bad news when I tell a wife that her husband has died of a massive myocardial infarct. Not more than five minutes later, I hear her reporting to the rest of the family that he has died of a “massive internal fart.”

4. During a patient’s two week follow-up appointment with me, his cardiologist, he mentions that he’s having trouble with one of his medications. “Which one?” I ask.  He replies, “The patch. Your nurse told me to put on a new one every six hours and now I’m running out of places to put them.” I have him quickly undress and discover what I hope I wouldn’t see: the man has over fifty patches on his body. Apparently, the nurse failed to point out that the instructions clearly state to remove the old patch before applying a new one.

5. While acquainting myself with a new elderly patient, I ask, “How long have you been bedridden?” After a look of complete confusion she answers, “Why, not for about twenty years, when my husband was still alive.”

6. I’m performing rounds at the hospital one morning and while checking up on a man, I ask, “How’s your breakfast this morning?”  He replies, “It’s very good except for the Kentucky Jelly. I can’t seem to get used to the taste.” I then ask to see the jelly, and the patient produces a foil packet labeled “KY Jelly.”

7. A young woman with purple hair styled into a punk rocker Mohawk, sporting a variety of tattoos and wearing strange clothing, enters the emergency room. We quickly determine that she has acute appendicitis, so we schedule her for immediate surgery. When she’s completely disrobed and on the operating table, we notice that her pubic hair has been dyed green and above it is a tattoo that reads, “Keep off the grass.” Once the surgery was completed, I write a short note on the patient’s dressing, which says “Sorry. We had to mow the lawn.”

8. As a new MD doing his residency in OB, I was quite embarrassed when performing female pelvic exams. To cover my unease, I unconsciously formed a habit of whistling softly. On one occasion, a middle-aged lady upon whom I am performing an exam suddenly bursts out laughing. I look up from my work and sheepishly say, “I’m sorry. Was I tickling you?” With tears running down her cheeks from laughing so hard, she replies, “Not at all, Doctor. But you were whistling ‘I wish I was an Oscar Meyer Wiener’. In the future, you might want to change that tune.”

9. A woman and a baby are in the examining room, waiting for me to come in for the baby’s first exam. I arrive in a rush, as usual, and examine the baby, check his weight, and being a little concerned, ask if the baby is being breast-fed or bottle-fed.  “Breast-fed,” the woman replies. “Strip down to your waist,” I say.  She does. I pinch her nipples, press, knead, and rub both her breasts for a while in a very professional and detailed examination. Motioning to her to get dressed, I say, “No wonder this baby is underweight. You don’t have any milk.” The woman smiles and says, “I know. I’m his Grandma. But I’m glad I came.”

Posted in Single Ship | Leave a comment

Starjammer

A good friend and fellow aviator sent me this link: Starjammer. After checking it out, I understand why. He and Elgin Wells are molded from the same batch of whatever it is that makes us what we are, that drives us to dream, to strive for something really special, to reject the boundaries that life and circumstance may set for us.

And before you click away because you think this post is only for aviators, I encourage you to take a look at the video and meet Elgin Wells. Watch and listen to a man connect you with his two passions in a way no one has ever combined them before. Starjammer represents a remarkable achievement, and it’s worth a moment to meet the man who found a way to blend music with three-dimensional aerial ballet.

Posted in Single Ship | 1 Comment

Why We Write

I participate in two writer’s groups, one that meets twice a month (currently with 15-20 regular members) and another that meets weekly (with 4 active members).

For various reasons, members of the smaller group haven’t been submitting material for critique as consistently as in the past. Rather than cancel our meetings, we often decide to participate in a free-for-all in which the discussion guides itself. Someone might suggest a topic, or ask a question about a particular aspect of another member’s novel, and we’ve never had a problem with silence in the room.

Last Tuesday, three of us met with no pre-established agenda and ended up running over by a half hour. The discussion began with individual updates on progress with our novels and agent searches, but soon transitioned all by itself into an exploration of why we write.

The other two members described very early voracious reading habits and interest in word-smithing. I’ve heard writers mention long lists of books they read as youngsters and how that served as the seed from which the desire to tell stories grew into a compelling necessity. They can’t not write. And in many cases, it appears that to ignore the writer in them is to deny the connection between who they are as individuals and why they write.

I remained relatively silent for a good part of the meeting, which for those who know me might be considered as indicative of having passed out. To the contrary, I listened to the discussion with attentive interest, driven by what in retrospect I can only describe as detachment. That might sound contradictory, but it felt at the time as if they were talking about something foreign to me, and that I needed to understand by stepping back for a broader view.

To offer a bit of backstory to justify that statement, most of my writer friends consider their novels to be mainstream literary. If asked to explain what that means, a hundred writers very likely would provide about that many definitions. Writing isn’t a science (thankfully), but that also leads to a pervasive undercurrent of miscommunication when writers gather. You’d think that as wordcrafters, we’d be really good at expressing ourselves. For the most part in my experience that’s true. But as mentioned elsewhere in this blog logbook, it doesn’t take much to stir up a discussion, and terminology often serves as the spoon.

In my opinion, the most basic distinction separating one type of fiction from another is that of whether a novel can be considered literary or something else, commonly referred to as commercial fiction. I personally think there’s a better term, because one source describes commercial as the only appellation applied after the fact based on the number of copies sold.

I prefer to consider fiction as being most broadly separated into literary and genre (or category) fiction for two reasons: the clearest definition of literary is no defined genre, and the recognition that writers, agents, editors and publishers don’t define genres. The market does, and it’s driven entirely by reader expectation. To take that reasoning a step further, I submit that readers of literary fiction don’t know what to expect, and the uncertainty is a primary reason they like it.

It’s also my belief that many writers would agree with describing literary fiction as that which exhibits exceptional mastery of language. The creative use of vocabulary and syntax invites readers to linger over single sentences and not be in a rush. One source described the difference between literary and genre fiction by contrasting a three-hour fine-dining experience with a pie-eating contest. Literary fiction often deals with difficult topics. It pushes against cultural boundaries of subject matter and human behavior. It stretches comprehension and addresses fundamental issues of human existence. And in most, if not all cases, it flows from within and reflects the writer’s personal experience. Not in terms of specific real-world events and characters, necessarily, but on a deeper, universal level that transcends individuals.

At one point in the discussion, one of the members asked me something to the effect of, “What about you?” My answer contrasted what I’d been hearing from them with a far different motivation behind my desire to write.

Unlike many of my writer friends, I have no message to convey, no target behavior or thought or attitude to change as a result of having read my novels. To insinuate that their writing has an agenda and mine doesn’t may seem like a criticism, but that’s not my intent. I simply write for different reasons: to share my love of aviation and tell an entertaining story. If I can increase a reader’s understanding of what it’s like to be an aviator, I’ve exceeded my expectations.

As we ended the discussion, one of the members offered the observation that my approach to writing shared the most important element common to all writers: the irresistible need to sit down and do it. And the three of us agreed that for those friends and acquaintances who say something like, “I’ve always wanted to write a novel, but I’ve just never gotten around to it,” the best advice we can offer is, “Then don’t even try.”

It’s one of the hardest things I’ve ever tried to do. Strangely enough, in spite of not having reached the elusive goal of publication, it’s also one of the most rewarding.

Posted in Writing | 2 Comments

ABNA Wordfight – Round One

Beginning earlier today, February 7, 2011, up to 5,000 word fighters crammed into each half of  the Amazon Breakthrough Novel Award (ABNA) corral drew their pens and fired word bullets as Amazon editors began reading the Pitch for each valid contest entry. This part of the melee will not end until February 22, 2011, at which time only 1000 word fighters will remain standing in each half of the corral.

Following most shootouts, survivors head to the saloon for a shot of rotgut whiskey. They frequently overshoot their original intention to celebrate responsibly by tossing down multiple shots (I realize the previous sentence is shot full of shots), and they usually end up very much the worse for the wear the next morning.

But from what I can tell by reading the rules, Round One survivors will avoid the possibility of a morning-after hangover. Amazon does not identify the contestants who advance to Round Two, which begins on February 24 and ends March 13, 2011. For six weeks, it’s happening out there somewhere, in Amazonspace, and all the contestants can do is go about our business and ignore that which is beyond our control.

That may be hard for me. During the two-week entry period, I managed to resist the ever-present temptation to take another look at the Entry form, the Pitch, the Excerpt, and the Manuscript. As a world-renowned word-tinkerer, who allows doubt to creep onto a page while doing nothing more than getting a cup of coffee, two weeks is a very long time to leave the words where they lie. Six weeks seems like an eternity.

Maybe this was the first step in turning over a new leaf. Or not. More than likely I simply didn’t think about the contest very much after submitting my entry, and I ended up surprised last Sunday evening when I realized that the contest materials were figuratively going to be chiseled in granite at midnight. Any attempt to review them would be nothing more than surrendering to the familiar word-fiddle obsession that feeds on self-doubt and the pervasive belief that I can do better than that.

Maybe I can, but I won’t know if the Pitch and Excerpt were good enough to put me in the top 5% until March 22, 2011, when Amazon  posts each Quarter Finalist’s Excerpts and their associated reviews online.

In the meantime. like the mobster says, “Fahget abaht it.”

And he’s right.

P.S. For a more literary commentary on ABNA, do yourself a favor and visit Marian Youngblood’s delightfully fun and thought-provoking blog.

Self-described as a Writing weblog, local, topical, personal, spiritual, Marian’s theme, inserted images, and delicious writing provide an experience both pleasing to the eye and stimulating to the mind, even one as generally comatose as mine. She also entered the contest, and I have a sneaking suspicion that her pen shoots straighter than the one I’m holding.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Another Sip of Kool-Aid

What follows is a phone conversation between me and a representative of the GremlinBusters (GB),  a company whose technicians combine the expertise and knowledge of Time Warner Cable, Netflix, Apple TV, and all things unfathomable to one of my generation:

GB: “So, Mr. McIntosh, tell me about the problems you’re having with Netflix streaming over Apple TV.”

TM: “It’s like someone else has control of the remote. He’ll hit pause for no reason. Or fast forward. Last night he kept muting the sound. If I could see the jerk, I’d shoot him, but he’s like an invisible gremlin.”

GB: “Well, you’ve come to the right place, Mr. McIntosh. For five-hundred bucks, I can take care of that for you.”

TM: “Excuse me?”

GB: “That includes tax.”

TM: “It better include a four-hundred-dollar instant rebate. Are you out of your mind?”

GB: “This is an intricate operation, sir. And dangerous. We’ve had to invest in very expensive equipment and train for months to do this safely.”

TM: [Insert sounds of laughter here] “Okay, you’ve got one minute to tell me what you do and why I shouldn’t hang up right now.”

GB: “In order to provide you with the flawless streaming you deserve, we have to evaluate all the possible sources of trouble. From Netflix through the Time Warner Cable system to your router upstairs to the Apple TV downstairs to your TV and receiver. And we’ve already done that–”

TM: “Hold on a second. You’ve what?”

GB: “We’ve evaluated all that from here, Mr. McIntosh. That’s the easy part.”

TM: “You came into my house without me knowing about it?”

GB: “In a manner of speaking, yes.”

TM: “Do me a favor and speak in that manner so I understand how you did that.”

GB: “It’s a piece of digital cake, sir. How do you think those messages appear on your computer screen telling you there’s a later version of iWhatever available and if you don’t install it right now you’re risking an iDisaster?”

TM: “I don’t know, and frankly I don’t want to. In thirty seconds, what’s wrong with my system?”

GB: “Your system is fine. The culprit is the air in your house. It’s interfering with the wireless signal. We’ll replace it with really good air and your problem is solved.”

TM: “Of course. I should have known that. You mentioned tax, and materials have to be part of this magic solution, right?”

GB: “Yessir. And the good air is expensive. We never use the cheap stuff.”

[Insert a click and silence here]

Okay, back to the real world. Part 2 of this Kool-Aid party involves temporary installation of a system that offers an alternative to wireless, which is a topic all unto itself.

I hate to admit this to anyone a couple of decades younger than myself, but when someone says, “WiFi.” I thought up until yesterday that they meant “wireless.” But no, that’s just one kind of wireless technology among many. So when I walk into the Apple store and hear the explanation of how this cute, sexy little device sits near my entertainment system and wirelessly transforms my world, it never occurs to me that I should ask about any compatibility issues between my router and the Apple TV.

In fairness to the Apple store, its function is to sell the products and provide customer service for them, not evaluate how they might integrate with an infinite variety of other components. Which means that unless the customer has either the do-it-yourself knowledge or the spare time to acquire it, problems more than likely await.

At this point in sipping the Kool-Aid, I know more about wireless than I did when pouring the first glass. I know, for example that: all wireless is not created equal; different products use different technologies; my router was top-of-the-line when I bought it back in 1992 (just kidding); Apple TV has IEEE 802.11n WiFi that supposedly improves network throughput, increases maximum raw data rate from 54 to 600 Mb/s with four spatial streams at a channel width of 40 hz, and MIMO (which stands for multiple-input multiple-output and refers to the use of multiple antennas at both the transmitter and receiver to improve communications performance).

Now if you’re like me, and all that tends to tumble your gyros (please excuse the pilot term), you’re looking for some plain language explanation to help you understand. The function of that cursory knowledge in this saga is to know that the wireless communication between my router and the Apple TV might be the problem. Think of a grandparent holding a smartphone for the first time and trying to text-message a grandchild.

At this moment in the rapidly changing technological world, wireless is very, very good, but it can’t provide the same degree of reliability as wired. This is especially true for streaming high-definition video signals. So even if I purchased a new router with the latest version of WiFi technology, I might not achieve the flawless streaming I was led to expect by sipping the Kool-Aid for the first time.

But wait! There might be a solution that doesn’t cost $500. It’s called Powerline Ethernet, and for those of you who don’t know, it’s pretty kool.

Here’s how it works. My Time Warner Internet connection at the router ignores the bad air in my house and sends the signal along the following path: through an Ethernet cable to one Powerline adaptor plugged into an electrical outlet; through the wiring in my house to an outlet near the entertainment center with a second adaptor; through an Ethernet cable to the Apple TV.

It just so happens that I have access to a Powerline system. Two days ago, I borrowed it and for the first time in this maddening cycle of frustration encountered plug and play. (I have to mention that the borrowed system had initially been set up by someone else, so there may be other steps if I’d hauled a brand new one out of a box.) For this test, I watched movies on Netflix during prime time and compared that experience with the previous wireless version.

There’s no question that signal reliability has improved. The Spinning Wheel of Death has all but taken a holiday, but it’s still not flawless. I’ve been led to believe that for some customers it is, even with WiFi, so what’s causing the momentary video pauses, skips, and audio cutouts? They don’t make the movie unwatchable like before, but it’s as if I’m sitting there wondering, What’s next? That’s not relaxing, which is what this is all about.

“Why don’t we watch a movie, darling, and see what kind of glitches await us tonight?”

“That’s a good idea. I’ll get the Kool-Aid.”

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Posted in Single Ship | Leave a comment